Checked, not fully reviewed
A llama.cpp-based decision server whose /v1/systemone works with the official SDK unchanged. Checked, not fully reviewed: the wire, and the CPU cost.
Good for
- A local stand-in for Jev that existing SDK code reaches with a base-URL change
- Answers that report coverage — how much of the model's mass landed on your options
Watch out for
- On a four-core CPU, about 0.8 s for one question and 11 s for twenty
- Checks GitHub for updates once a day unless SNAP_NO_UPDATE_CHECK is set
Tested Oct 4, 2026 at bb1e6a226c73 · v0.5.0 Linux x86_64 release binary (checksum verified) in Docker, snap1-2b Q4_K_M on 4 CPU cores, --threads 4; driven by the official @typesafe-ai/sdk 0.6.0
Checked, not fully reviewed. We ran the v0.5.0 release binary, verified against its published
checksum, let it fetch its 1.5 GB default model, and drove it with TypeSafe’s own JS SDK. No Jev
calls.
Of the three servers we drove with the official SDK today — NotJev, sys1 and snap — this is the only one that worked unchanged. systemOne() with the model
set to snap1-2b or left as jev-latest returned answers keyed by question name, each with
status and coverage beside the probabilities. Identical requests repeated to the digit, including
the first ask of a state it had never seen — with one exception: the first request after the server
started scored a Score question 0.6714 where every repeat said 0.6934. A score also moved when other
questions shared its request (0.6794 alone), which is the cost of the shared prefill the design is
built on.
The README’s speed figures are from an M1 Max with Metal. On four CPU cores, one question took
788 ms and twenty took 11.2 s, about 550 ms each after the first. The process held 2.9 GB.
On our negation probe the default model sat near 0.5–0.6 for “Is it false that this is a billing
problem?” on billing messages, so phrase conditions positively. Outbound traffic is the model
download and a daily release check to api.github.com, which prints on stderr only and is switched
off by SNAP_NO_UPDATE_CHECK. MIT, 22 stars.
See how it compares with other tools in Best Jev tools, tested hands-on.
Review updated Oct 4, 2026. Numbers quoted from the project are its author's own; we don't publish our own measurements of Jev.